PublicationsScientific articles

Measurements of in vivo intra-articular gentamicin levels from antibiotic loaded articulating spacers in revision total knee replacement

Spacer-K
Authors Authors
Mutimer J, Gillespie G, Lovering AM, Porteous AJ
Institute Institute
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Journal Journal
Knee. 2009 Jan;16(1):39-41.
Take
Take Home message:

  • Preformed spacers guarantee therapeutic concentrations of antibiotic in synovial fluid surrounding the joint throughout the period of implantation
  • The key is the antibiotic release performance, not the antibiotic dose
Study details Score Range
Subject Clinical
Type Retrospective study 1 1-3
Journal The Knee 2 1-3

Summary

A high concentration of gentamicin was found in synovial liquid of 12 patients which received Spacer-K on the day of spacer removal.

Patients characteristics
12 patients (6 M, 6 F) with a mean age of 71 years
Pathogens: Coagulase-negative Staphyococcus (10), Stapylococcus aureus (2)

Treatment
Spacer-K was fixed with gentamicin-loaded cement. Drains removed after 24h. A 14-day regime of parenteral ABX followed by a further 4 weeks of oral ABX.
No patients received further administration of gentamicin.

Median spacer implantation (range)
99 days (63 – 274)
Two implants were left in situ more due to patients comorbidities

Mean FU
10 months

Results

Infection eradication
100% (12/12 patients)

Gentamicin concentration in synovial fluid
From 0,24 to 2,36 mg/L (0,46 mg/L)

Gentamicin concentration in blood samples
Very low or below the limit of detection

Gentamimicin Level at 2 nd Stage Revision

I
Key points:

  • Therapeutic concentration (0,46 mg/L) of Gentamicin in synovial fluid around the joint after 99 days of spacer implantation
  • Low concentration of Gentamicin (0,06 mg/L) in blood: no toxicity (recommended max daily dose limit 5 mg/Kg/day)
  • Antibiotic release from preformed spacers depends on polymer matrix, and not on the antibiotic dose


Spacer-K

Score

Study value Description
* Retrospective study
* * Retrospective comparative
Retrospective Register study
* * * Prospective study
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
Journal value Description
* Low impact factor (1.500)
* * Medium impact factor (1.500-2.500)
* * * High impact factor (>2.500)
Hi, I’m mover

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *